I just don’t
know. Being such a fan of Star Trek, I,
of course, knew the guy who played Jesus here.
It was Jeffrey Hunter, the guy who was the original captain of the
starship Enterprise in the original pilot that didn’t sell, and showed up later
in the two-parter “The Menagerie” so Roddenberry could use that original pilot
and spread it out over two episodes during the first season. He was different from Shatner’s Kirk, and
actually harkened back to the days of Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon from the
cheap 40’s and 50’s movie serials that the character of Tom Paris loved so much
on Star Trek: Voyager.
I had previously been disappointed in The Greatest Story Ever Told, which I referred to as "Not the Greatest Movie Ever Made About the Greatest Story Ever Told" and hoped
this old retelling of the Jesus story would be better. It seems, however, that whenever Hollywood
tackled the story of Jesus, they tried to give Jesus and the material the somber reverence it deserves, and
it just doesn’t work. In their attempt
to make Jesus so worshipful and perfect, it always left Jesus, and the
material, feeling overly detached instead.
Besides being the Son of God, of course, Jesus was a great teacher and
philosopher, but he was also quite human, and was never that
detached. Never do we feel while
watching these old movies about Jesus that he has real feelings for the humans
he walks with and teaches. Instead, it is some isolated connection to the
Father, as if to say, “Yes, I love all you little people, but I am also above
you. Behold me and my grand but quiet
love and grace!” I didn’t get that
feeling with Robert Powell’s performance in Jesus
of Nazareth. In that movie, even
though he carried the look of grace and wisdom, when he looked at other people,
or taught them, he also carried a look of pure love for them in his eyes. These other movie Jesus’ are always looking
upward, and if they do look at the others they are on screen with, it feels
like happenstance. These other movie
Jesus’ don’t have the loving connection with people they do with the Father,
and that’s just not right. THEY are the
REASON HE CAME!
Jeffrey Hunter as Jesus in "King of Kings" |
While watching King of Kings with Mom, I shut it off after the scene where Jesus
collects Peter and tells him he will make him a “fisher of men.” As shot for this film, it simply felt like
actors on a movie set repeating lines of dialogue. None of it felt real. I then showed her the same scene in Franco
Zeffirelli’s Jesus of Nazarath, and
there simply was no comparison.
The Zeffirelli film seemed infinitely more “real”! Not only did Jesus seem more real, but so did
Peter and all the others, and even the sets were more real.
The
weird thing is, I am sometimes a fan of epic Hollywood bravado, even
over realism, and it is the reason I still like The Ten Commandments over some more realistic movies about Moses,
such as the TNT version. But for
whatever reason, the same kind of thing just doesn’t work for Jesus. The best version of the Jesus story is Jesus of Nazareth. All the others just don’t measure up!
Nice Gary!
ReplyDelete~Kim
Good day! I can clearly notice that you deeply get the sense of what you are speaking about. Do you own an education that is linked with the theme of this article? Can't wait to hear from you.
ReplyDeleteMissis Carolyns,
ReplyDeleteMy education is in elementary education, early childhood development, and English with an emphasis on European and American Literature and creative writing. I have no formal education in theology, yet I've studied a lot over the years. Thanks for the interest!