Saturday, February 11, 2012

A Government of Nancy Pelosi, by Nancy Pelosi, and for Nancy Pelosi

Image from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44598.html

I wrote this two years ago in January of 2010, but I think it has bearing during an election year, and helps to explain why I'm voting Republican:
Senator Stephen Brown won the Republican seat for the spot vacated by the deceased Ted Kennedy in the bluest of blue states that has had a democrat there for about as long as America has existed, and the White House and the democrats don’t seem to take this as a sign (or don’t want to admit) that they are unpopular and that the American people don’t want their brand of Socialistic change.  Like the true dictators they really are, they are still attempting to shove that monstrosity of a socialistic health care bill down our throats, mad with power and pushing forward no matter WHAT the American people want.  I’m sorry, but unless I just woke up in Venezuela under Hugo Chavez’ thumb, I thought this was a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, not Nancy Pelosi’s “Whatever I say goes”, belligerent power trip!  Isn’t it the people who have final say in how they are to be governed, and not the other way around?  Didn’t the founding fathers build government with checks and balances so that power hungry, delusional tyrants wouldn’t be able to take over control from the people?  Why are Pelosi and Obama going forward with such an unpopular agenda the public obviously doesn’t want?  And why is the mainstream media still in bed with them, spinning it every which way but honestly?

No comments:

Post a Comment