I just don’t
know. Being such a fan of Star Trek, I,
of course, knew the guy who played Jesus here.
It was Jeffrey Hunter, the guy who was the original captain of the
starship Enterprise in the original pilot that didn’t sell, and showed up later
in the two-parter “The Menagerie” so Roddenberry could use that original pilot
and spread it out over two episodes during the first season. He was different from Shatner’s Kirk, and
actually harkened back to the days of Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon from the
cheap 40’s and 50’s movie serials that the character of Tom Paris loved so much
on Star Trek: Voyager.
I had previously been disappointed in The Greatest Story Ever Told, which I referred to as "Not the Greatest Movie Ever Made About the Greatest Story Ever Told" and hoped
this old retelling of the Jesus story would be better. It seems, however, that whenever Hollywood
tackled the story of Jesus, they tried to give Jesus and the material the somber reverence it deserves, and
it just doesn’t work. In their attempt
to make Jesus so worshipful and perfect, it always left Jesus, and the
material, feeling overly detached instead.
Besides being the Son of God, of course, Jesus was a great teacher and
philosopher, but he was also quite human, and was never that
detached. Never do we feel while
watching these old movies about Jesus that he has real feelings for the humans
he walks with and teaches. Instead, it is some isolated connection to the
Father, as if to say, “Yes, I love all you little people, but I am also above
you. Behold me and my grand but quiet
love and grace!” I didn’t get that
feeling with Robert Powell’s performance in Jesus
of Nazareth. In that movie, even
though he carried the look of grace and wisdom, when he looked at other people,
or taught them, he also carried a look of pure love for them in his eyes. These other movie Jesus’ are always looking
upward, and if they do look at the others they are on screen with, it feels
like happenstance. These other movie
Jesus’ don’t have the loving connection with people they do with the Father,
and that’s just not right. THEY are the
REASON HE CAME!
Jeffrey Hunter as Jesus in "King of Kings"
While watching King of Kings with Mom, I shut it off after the scene where Jesus
collects Peter and tells him he will make him a “fisher of men.”As shot for this film, it simply felt like
actors on a movie set repeating lines of dialogue.None of it felt real.I then showed her the same scene in Franco
Zeffirelli’s Jesus of Nazarath, and
there simply was no comparison.The Zeffirelli film seemed infinitely more “real”!Not only did Jesus seem more real, but so did
Peter and all the others, and even the sets were more real.
The
weird thing is, I am sometimes a fan of epic Hollywood bravado, even
over realism, and it is the reason I still like The Ten Commandments over some more realistic movies about Moses,
such as the TNT version.But for
whatever reason, the same kind of thing just doesn’t work for Jesus.The best version of the Jesus story is Jesus of Nazareth.All the others just don’t measure up!
This is from my journal from August of 1999, as I was detailing some of the major news events of that month and writing down my thoughts about them. Interestingly enough, however, I just saw a rather fascinating old TV miniseries recently rebroadcast on TV called Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, made in 2000, detailing the events surrounding the Ramsey murder. My final words on this subject in 1999 are, unfortunately, still true today!
Colorado held
its collective breath when a little three year old boy, Jaryd Atadero, became
separated from his church group and got lost in the mountains. They never found him… Not knowing what
happened must be torture for his parents!!!
This book tells the whole story
Also, Governor Bill Owens discreetly
pointed a finger at John and Patsy Ramsey concerning the murder of their little
girl Jon-Bonet, asking them to “quit hiding behind their high-priced lawyers
and help with the investigation.”The
Ramseys’ answer to Gov. Owens, and the nation, will be a tell-all book about
Jon-Bonet and her murder, told from a Christian perspective.I’m sure John and Patsy will paint themselves
as an upstanding, loving, Christian family who are victims of this
tragedy.If they are innocent, may God
be with them.But why do they feel so
guilty?
John and Patsy Ramsey
Is it the overexposure in a biased media, who
are trying them out of court in front of the public and finding them
guilty?Is it a bungling police
investigation that has taken more than three years without any results?Is it the action of the parents of the
murdered girl, who don’t seem to be cooperating and are using their money to
hide from the investigation?Would I act
the same way if I had a murdered daughter and the media tried and convicted me
and I had the money and power to hide from a police force that was trying to
prove my guilt?
Susan Smith
I don’t want to try them out of
court, but everybody has an opinion based on the evidence they’ve seen. And the sad fact remains that guilty people
will so often proclaim their innocence.
Remember Susan Smith? She cried
in front of TV cameras for a week, begging her sons’ kidnappers through tear
stained eyes to please return them safe and sound, and her husband quietly
supporting her from the sidelines. Then
the truth came out: She had locked them
into her car and pushed the vehicle into a nearby river, where her little boys
drowned. People maintaining their
innocence doesn’t mean they’re innocent!
That’s what police investigators are here for, to catch the liars. What little evidence we have in the Ramsey case
seems to point to John and Patsy due to inconsistencies in their actions and
statements, yet I’ll admit, I’m not the one with all the answers and am only
casually following all of this.
Only one thing for certain can be
derived from all this: Justice has not
been served, and it doesn’t look like it’s going to be served either.
Even before July's tragic news of a madman entering a midnight showing of The Dark Knight Rises and opening fire on an unsuspecting crowd of moviegoers in Aurora, killing twelve innocent people, and wounding 59 more, Colorado had already been in the national news because of all the fires ravaging our state. I wrote this last month:
June was the month that the
luscious, green, and beautiful state of Colorado was on fire!
Almost immediately after science
fiction author Ray Bradbury died (the guy who wrote the classic sci fi novel Fahrenheit 451, I might add), a series
of devastating fires developed, starting in northern Colorado, burning through
37,000 acres before it was even partially contained!Dubbed the “High Park” fire, it burned
through another 25,000 acres up by Fort Collins, where almost 200 homes were
destroyed.On the morning of June 12th,
high southern winds blew the smoke and smog even down into our neck of the
woods in Westminster, Broomfield, Boulder, Arvada, and Denver.We could see all the smoke surrounding us
when we stepped outside, and it smelled liked a campfire or a barbecue!
People will try to get away with
anything they can. At work, that means
our timesheets need to have lines drawn through the days we didn’t work and a
zero with a line through it in the overtime column, because, as you might
suspect, people have cheated and written in other amounts after it was
signed by their manager! For these High
Park fires, it means someone was dressing as a firefighter and going into the
fire zones to steal equipment from the firefighters and stuff left behind by
people who had been evacuated! People
will try anything!
By the end of the month, we were
experiencing some very hot days with no rain in sight to help put out the fire,
and after this Fort Collins fire burned through 70,000 acres, eight more fires
developed around the state on June 24th, with many homes and
businesses lost! Most were caused by
lightning strikes, but the one that struck Manitou Springs and Colorado Springs
was suspected of being the result of arson.
All of Manitou Springs, and parts of Estes Park and Colorado Springs
were evacuated, and that fire blazed out of control for days at the same time
firefighters were still trying to contain the High Park fire, and other fires
were starting all over the place, including up in the Boulder area, and which
we could see developing and working it’s way over a mountain close to our
offices in Broomfield, which they called the Flagstaff fire.
My brother posted on Facebook how the
Flying W. Ranch that we had been to twice had burned down (yet interestingly
enough, we later learned that the building holding a bunch of irreplaceable
books was the only building left intact!).
Visiting the Flying W. Ranch for the first time in 2008
This building was amazingly left standing!
Even in the rain, we enjoyed the show in 2011!
The Waldo Canyon fire down south burned it to the ground, along with
several other homes and businesses in the area.The High Park fire was finally contained after burning through 87,000
acres, and yet the Colorado Springs fire was eventually considered to be even
more devastating!
Meanwhile, Obama took time out of
shoving that monstrosity of a health care bill down our throats, with the
Supreme Court supporting it as a “tax” even though Obama had made a huge point
of making sure everyone knew it was NOT a “tax”, to come to Colorado and survey
the destruction and devastation, but if you ask me, he was just getting in the
way, what with all the secret service and political reporters and other
assorted entourage that has to follow him around wherever he goes!
At the same time all this was going
on, we heard reports of Hurrican Debby wrecking havoc in Florida, causing mass
flooding and devastation! They were
getting some of the rain we needed to be able to put out all those fires!
My heart goes out to all those
people who lost their homes during this horrible tragedy, and especially the
four who died from the fires! I can’t
even imagine losing everything in a fire like that, but those who survived
should at least be glad that they are still alive and kicking. The website for the Flying W. Ranch said it
all the best on their website (linked here), expressing their sorrow not only for their own tragedy, but for
those who lost their homes, but also announcing that once they have had a
chance to gather their thoughts, they will rebuild!
God, I humbly
ask for You to open my heart, like it was when I was a child. I know that an open heart is easily wounded,
and I’m not asking for a wounded heart, even though I know that, in this world,
an open heart and a wounded heart are too often one and the same! I guess I just cherish my innocence, and when it comes right down to it, I’d rather have an
open heart that is wounded than a closed, unfeeling heart encased in
steel. A lot of times, I do shut myself
and my heart away to keep from getting wounded further, but it has the affect
of hardening me, and that, I do not like.
I think that the harder and more
unfeeling my heart becomes, the less likely I’ll make it to heaven, and the
less heavenly I’ll be. And I deeply
desire heaven and eternity with God.
There are hints here on earth of what heaven may be like, but also a lot
of hints as to what hell could be like.
I hope to make it to heaven, and am willing to do whatever it takes to
get there. If that means opening myself
up for more hurt, so be it. That may be
the price I have to pay for paradise.
Jesus’ words could be interpreted that way, for he said the meek will
inherit the earth, and the least here will be the greatest there.
I don’t care if I’m of higher rank in heaven
or not; I just want to get in.
- From my journal, November 1999
(The picture was drawn by me using the Microsoft paint program; I couldn't find an image on Google I liked well enough)
What’s so wrong about daydreaming
And what’s so bad about
feeling optimistic?
There’s no use tryin’ to
hide
It’s right there in your
eyes
Well, I can feel it when
my heart beats
We’d be fools not to jump
in with both feet
Because His love’s comin’
over me, yeah
And His love’s comin’ over
you
Well, it’s what we were
made for
All I have prayed for
Comin’ to set us free
Yeah, His love’s comin’
over you and me!
Tears ain’t got no
business here, no, no
And heartache’s gonna lose
its place in line
The feeling’s mutual
There’s no doubt in my
soul
If ever my dreams got shot
down
I know He’d steady my
shaky ground…
I don’t question this
moment
And I won’t hesitate no
more, no!
This time the shadows
Won’t dare to darken my
door (darken my door) Like before, yeah…
As I said when I first started writing these blog posts, I've been writing in a journal since 1991, and after 20 years, I figured it was high time I might start sharing them in a blog. I've had friends interested in knowing what I might have to say on any given subject. When I was out of work in December of last year and going on interviews, I remember telling one hiring manager how much I love to write, and how I've kept a journal for so long, and when he asked me if I blog, I said "No," and he asked me why; and that got me thinking that maybe it was time.
Ten years ago, I changed the way I wrote my journal. All the entries were starting to become predictable and rather boring I thought, talking about what I did that day, and what I ate, and then what I did the next day, and what I ate, and occasionally, I wrote about what I thought about everything. So I decided to keep a running tab on things, and started keeping notes throughout the month about what was going on, and then writing about it when the month was over.
I kept notes on what was going on with me and the family, and work, and my walk with God, and the news (culture), and then wrote about some things I liked from the world of pop culture, reviewing movies and TV shows I liked, or didn't like, along with the music I was listening to, the books I was reading, and, eventually, the people I was admiring for one reason or another. I didn't always keep the best notes, and didn't always write the most poetic stuff, but sporadically, I felt I said something halfway intelligent, in an elegant way. Visiting the internet and reading most of the stuff from the blogosphere, I began to realize that my writing had some style, and a voice of it's own, and unlike many (way too many) of the other writers on the world wide web, I had a pretty good grasp of syntax, grammar, and spelling.
So my intention with this blog was to start posting both new and old writings from my journal, scouring over some of my old journal entries to post some interesting stuff from years ago in the middle of each week, and finding more recent stuff to post on the weekend. I've been doing just that since January, and I've gotten a few people to start reading it, perhaps posting a comment here or there (some of those comments seeming to come from people with their own websites trying to sell me something; gotta love it!).
I find it amusing to note that hardly anyone will read some of my more serious stuff, like "Three Parables and a Rabid Dog: Nope Nothing Wrogn Here" (linked here) or "Strange Bedfellows: Susan G. Komen, Margaret Sanger, and the Dixie Chicks" (linked here), and that the page with the most visits is the one where I reviewed the movie Bride of Chucky (linked here), and that people are visiting it from doing an image search of Chucky and Tiffany. I eventually removed the image to calm them down. I don't want my blog to be known as "the one with the picture of Chucky and Tiffany"!
So when a tragedy occurs, especially close to home, like all the fires in Colorado last month, or the Batman Movie Theater Massacre in Aurora in the wee hours of the morning just yesterday, I don't feel it's my place to comment on them immediately (and I certainly couldn't sum it up as emotionally and powerfully as survivor Christopher Ramos does in the second video below):
I may feel I have a lot to say, and I did post some things on Facebook about them already, including posting that above video, but with all the people talking, I don't feel this blog is the place to add to the conversation, especially immediately with a knee jerk reaction. I don't feel this blog will ever become that. And I never meant for this blog to be that. There are too many other people doing that.
I may eventually write about, and share, my thoughts about some of these major kind of events, after they've had a moment or two to resonate. For one thing, the way I write in my journal is a slow and meticulous process. I keep notes throughout the month, and then write about them in my journal at the beginning of the next month. I've written about the fires from last month already, and will probably share what I wrote about them in here at some point (maybe even next week), but I won't actually sit down and collect my thoughts about modern news events like this movie theater massacre until the beginning of August, and by then, it will be old news. That's okay though. This isn't a news site. It's just my blog.
Another thing I don't like to do is to get too personal. I've written some things in my journal that I don't want anyone else to see. Everybody has private thoughts and ideas about themselves and their friends and family that they don't really want to share with them. Some journal thoughts are just not the type of thing you want to share with the world. It's the main reason most journals and diaries are such a private affair. I also don't want to share a lot of the things that happened with the family because it's kind of like looking at someone's old home movies. It's boring for the people who don't know you - and even then, it's sometimes still boring! Still, I have shared, and will continue to share, a few such moments in this blog, if I feel they won't rankle too many feathers, and it is these blog entries that have a more whimsical, humorous style, such as "A Hunting We Will NOT Go," and "The Joy of Camping... NOT!" (These titles are links to the actual posts).
These blog posts have been, and will continue to be, selections from my journal writings, meaning they won't be up-to-the-minute interpretations of immediate events, but usually more reflective musings about past events. There are so many places on the web to get information about pressing events... I don't want this blog to be just one more droning voice among all the noise. Instead, it's merely entries taken from my journals, which are supposed to be my respite, to help me crystalize and galvanize my thoughts.
Information Overload
And after more than a decade of writing in this fashion, I've managed to collect a lot of them. These once a month reflections on Me & Family, Work, God, the News, and Pop Culture (split into reviews of movies, TV shows, music, and books) means I've written twelve essays, commentaries, or reviews for each subject everyyear, and since I've been writing in this fashion for at least the last twelve years, that's 144 of them for each subject, and probably about 100 people or fictional characters I've mentioned as Real or Reel Heroes along the way. I don't think I'll ever run out of material for this blog (or any future blog I may decide to start, for I may want to eventually create blogs for the different subjects I write about). Facebook is not the forum for such long meditations, though I will share little things there, such as the poem I wrote for my niece when she turned thirteen, or the story of how I thought Mom had suffered a stroke one day as we were leaving Target, with her hand bunched up and dragging her shoe along the ground, and then quickly coming to realize she was just trying to scrape gum off her shoe!
All I'm doing here is just going through my journals and picking and choosing what I think I might want to share in this blog at that particular moment, and that particular day, and that might just have something interesting to say, and then see what happens...
Since
I examined the physical world of cause and effect last month (Shared on my blog here), I thought I might
expand on that topic this month by stating how I wish God would be a cause that
affects me. He certainly has that
ability – Jesus is proof of that!I
really need Him, even though sometimes, I don’t seek Him.I know He did not set it up this way, and
with good reason, but I would still sometimes like a God who would stop me from
making mistakes, a God who, whenever I tended to go my own, human way or make sinful choices, would turn me around pronto, perhaps slap some sense into me, and say
“What are you doing?Stop it!Why are you acting like an idiot!Remember that you’re trying to make me proud
of you!Don’t screw it up!”
God's Intervention
But
that doesn’t happen, so I’ll just have to continue trying to understand God in
my limited, human way, and even though my puny mind can’t comprehend exactly
what He is and how He exists, it will just have to be enough as I follow in His
light loving Him, worshipping Him, and learning from His words and teaching.
Can
you blame me for wanting more? The
nature of God is that He is so close to us, yet is also far away. We cannot sense Him with our five senses, or
at least not that I’ve experienced, and if I did sense Him, I’d have to
question whether or not it was truly God, or something else. I’d probably end up questioning my own sanity. Because I haven’t sensed Him with my physical
senses, it makes Him pretty much undetectable and removed from the rest of us,
even if, in reality, He is not. And even
if I could sense Him, and knew it was my Creator, and not some trick of the
mind, or of Satan, I still couldn’t comprehend or understand Him, since He is
so immense and omnipotent and exists outside of this dimension.
Yet
all I want, all I’m asking for, is a little push in the right direction.
SPOILER ALERT: This post gives away the ending! Don't read it if you haven't seen The Grey! (Not that anybody is reading my blog anyway, ha ha!)
My twin brother and his wife would think I was crazy
for picking this movie as a favorite, especially after our initial reaction and
the fact that we saw a bunch of other perfectly fine movies this month.And perhaps they’d be right to make such an
observation.None of us liked it when we
first saw it. It was grueling to sit through,
and initially reminded me of Eight Below,
the one in which a group of dogs stranded in the wilderness begin to die one at
a time. This whole movie The Grey is really
nothing more than one death after another, as a group of plane crash survivors
perish in several ways trying to stay one step ahead of a pack of vicious
wolves.Some die from the wolf attacks,
and others from sickness, exposure to the elements, drowning, or falling great
distances.We even made jokes at the
end, similar to some critics who didn’t like it, about how the movie is nothing
but depressing and full of death, and for a survival tale, it’s interesting to
note that no one survives.I couldn’t
really understand what my sister and older brother saw in it when they mentioned on Facebook
how much they liked it, and the positive spiritual messages it had.For me, it was similar to Stephen King’s The Mist, which I had
picked to watch, and which had an extreme downer of an ending, causing my sister-in-law Darece to stand
up and shout “Gary!” and I could only look back sheepishly and apologize, and
my sister later reprimanded me for not warning her about it before she and her husband watched it.But this movie was obviously
different.We had had a negative reaction,
but there was all those positive reviews on Flixster, and my sister and brother supporting it on Facebook.It made me
wonder what I was missing.
Then
a strange thing happened. The next day
at church, the message was about the courage of St. Paul during impossible
situations from the book of Acts, and while the pastor gave his powerful, eloquent sermon, I couldn’t get The Grey out of my mind. It’s
almost like God was nudging me, saying “Look at it from this perspective. Examine it with Christian eyes.” I realized it wasn’t a survival tale, as it
had been promoted. It was actually a
tale about facing our fears, and death, and in that sense, it has a lot in
common with the third Alien
film. It’s basically a film not about
surviving, but facing death when survival is no longer a possibility. What do you do when you realize you are NOT
going to survive? In this case, everything
around these men – the plane, the snow, the wilderness, their own health, and
particularly the wolves – represent death.
Death is the final challenge, the final fear we must face. Jesus spoke to His followers many times in the Bible concerning the fears they faced, including death, and he told them “Do
not be afraid.”In the film, Liam Neeson
keeps seeing visions of his wife before she died of cancer, lying under sheets
in a sunny room, and telling him “Don’t be afraid,” and “It’s okay.”These visions would always end with him being
ripped back into the reality of his horrible situation.The men talk religion and philosophy around
the campfires they build to ward off the wolves and the cold, to stay warm, and
to stay alive.In the beginning, right
after the plane crash, one seriously injured man isn’t going to survive for
very long at all, and Neeson calms him down, asking him if there is someone he
loves who can help him cross over, and telling him to just accept it, and it
will come upon him, and it will be warm, and that it’s going to be okay.And it works.The guy dies rather peacefully.For the rest of the movie, each one of the survivors meets death.Some go kicking and screaming.Others seem to just accept it, like the
injured passenger.After injuring his
leg, the guy who was belittling the others simply can’t keep up anymore, and
they leave him by the river in the middle of a majestic view, and he accepts
what is going to happen to him.The
wolves will be there soon, but there is a peacefulness about him now.In the end, when it is only Neeson left, he
screams to the sky, telling God off, and demanding God for any kind of a sign
that He exists.Then he wanders right
into the middle of the wolf den, and though this could be considered God’s
answer, that’s not quite how the movie ends.At the beginning of the film, he’s suicidal, and almost bites a bullet
after the death of his wife.Now, even
though he finds himself surrounded by vicious, ravenous wolves, he tapes a
bunch of broken bottles to one hand, and holds a knife in the other.He wants to fight to live.And then there’s a mysterious five second
scene after the credits that shows the alpha wolf laying down on the ground and
breathing heavily, like it’s been mortally wounded, and you can see the top of
Neeson’s head on the other side of it, as if he’s using it as a pillow, as if
he is “laying down with death.”
I didn’t
much care for Alien 3 when I first
saw it, because they killed off almost the entire cast of Aliens, and it made that movie and that struggle now seem
pointless. The only survivors were the
android Bishop, in such disrepair that he doesn’t want to continue existing,
and Ripley, who soon comes to realize she has one of those alien things in her
chest and she’s not long for this world.
But that didn’t mean that Alien 3
wasn’t dealing with some interesting themes about death, and facing death, and
accepting death. It’s just not the sort
of movie you want to see when you’re expecting a fun, scary, sci fi survival
story like Aliens. The
Grey is very similar. Its
promotional campaign made it seem more like Aliens,
when in fact, it is much closer to Alien
3. That means that it may be
intelligent, and may deal with interesting themes, but it doesn’t make for such
an entertaining time at the movies. It’s
a movie you might not like while you watch it, but that doesn’t mean it might
not cause you to think about it later.
As such, this is a film that is also similar to Moulin Rouge and The Matrix,
or even Napoleon Dynamite, in that
it’s worth a second look. It’s more
enjoyable to think about afterwards, and it becomes one of those movies I might
actually want to see again, but with a different mindset.
Last week, I posted how Walt Disney's Pinocchio had very strong Christian connotations. This week, I'll examine Walt Disney's Fantasia, which was released during the same year (1940). Unlike Pinocchio, it is NOT Christian... not in the least!
Before reviewing Fantasia, however, here's a brief note on the follow up, Fantasia 2000, whichwasn’t much of a
movie:It clocks in at a mere 75
minutes, and that’s even with a replay of “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” from the
original film (poorly introduced by Penn and Teller, I might add).Despite some stunning animation at times,
such as the sequence with the humpback whales flying through the Aurora
Borealis, not even the animators seemed to be making such a big deal about it
all.After all, you can find stunning
animation all over the place these days.It is no longer such a great thing.The first Fantasia was full of
a bunch of pomp and circumstance, but Fantasia
2000 manages to introduce the animated pieces like some retrospective you
might find on some awards show or one of those TV specials where they count
down the best commercials or best big screen kisses.Steve Martin jokes all the way through his
presentation.
And
in retrospect, it makes the original Fantasia
seem not all that great either. The one
thing I kept thinking about the original Fantasia
while watching it was how undoubtedly brilliant this early animation was, light
years ahead of the “Silly Symphonies” Disney had already done or the “Merrie
Melodies” over at Warner Brothers, and with just Snow White and Pinocchio
having been released as animated features at the time Fantasia was released. At
the same time, I was thinking how much of a polar opposite it was to Pinocchio on a purely spiritual
level. While I easily gave a Christian reading
of Pinocchio (last week, linked here) I’m
afraid Fantasia would come off
looking very poor by comparison.
Some of Fantasia's more Demonic, Pagan, Racist, and Evolutionary Darwinist Elements
The
main sequence, “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” shows Mickey Mouse performing what
looks to be questionable black magic in a sorcerer’s dungeon, and those
multiplying brooms with arms are actually quite creepy if you think about
it. In fact, almost every sequence could
be considered questionable from a Christian perspective: The Faeries in the Tchaikovsky piece, or the
heavy emphasis on the gods and creatures of Roman myth, with Zeus throwing
lightning bolts at defenseless creatures on the ground (aside from the horrid
black stereotypes they had to edit out for the DVD release), or the “Rite of
Spring” sequence that implies, the same as Darwinists, how life evolved from nothing by chance. Even back then, there was no way for them to
explain how these era’s came about, and were reduced to creating a “mud screen”
in the water which would clear and show the next explosion of life. Evolutionary science has followed this same path all these years. There are an unbelievable number of “mud
screens” in which nothing has ever been explained. The only large sequence to escape this, by
the way, is the humorous “Dance of the Hours”, with dancing ostriches, hippos,
elephants, and crocodiles.
Scenes from the well animated but ultimately demonic "Night on Bald Mountain" sequence
The worst offense,
of course, is what is generally considered the film’s high point: “Night on Bald Mountain” with the skeletons,
ghosts, hellish demons, and the dark figure who looks surprisingly like an
interpretation of the devil in all his evil.
He is vanquished in this film by church bells, which give way to “Ave
Maria” which ends the movie, with figures moving quietly through a picturesque
countryside with glowing lanterns, but this sequence is so slow and languid, it
comes off as very inferior to the dancing demons and scary skeletons of the
previous sequence. That’s not the best
compliment you can give to an old animated movie, and probably one reason Fantasia isn’t quite as adored by
generations of children as Disney’s other films have been. I think you’d find that Fantasia is probably mostly appreciated by adult animation
aficionados only, and they probably aren’t Christian. I am, and although I bought it, merely
because I am also a bit of an adult animation freak, I am having reservations
about doing so after having watched it again. Despite
the early achievements in animation blended with classical music, there is no
continued narrative to hold the whole thing together, and it is about as
interesting today as watching an old block of pretty good music videos. It’s just not the same as a good narrative
movie, especially with all these spiritually questionable elements!
Comic books now? Talk about desperation! Talk about trivialities! Well, yes, but as I said before, it may be
the trivial that is the only thing that keeps me sane! Or to put it another way, Mad keeps me from going mad!
It’s nostalgic. I used to read Mad Magazine all the time when I was growing up. It’s artistic. Mort Drucker is one of the best caricaturists
in the business. It’s funny. I recently read the parody of
the movie The Shining, and it was just
brilliant. After seeing all the
malevolent spirits and blood all over the hotel, Danny’s finger (Tony) tells him it
isn’t real, just like in the movie. When
Danny gets covered in blood, he complains to his finger that he’s just a kid
and can’t handle it. His finger replies,
“Well, what do you want from me? I’m
just a finger!” At the end of the parody, when the
Nicholson character dies by freezing to death, the Shelly Duvall character
looks at him and suddenly remembers she’s got a frozen ham in the freezer.Then she tells Danny, “Now that your father’s
dead, we’ll have to find jobs to make a living.You can sell newspapers, and I may even have to sell my body.”The kid then says he’ll feel sad to know that
he’ll be making more money than her! I can't write any of that without giggling yet again.
Weird Al Reads Mad
This is a sad, or even evil world we live in sometimes, and
I am so glad for humor because it is about the only thing that can, at times, make life
palatable. Many people turn up
their noses at the likes of Mad Magazine
or “Weird Al” Yankovic for being so low-brow and unsophisticated (even Jerry
Springer Trailer Trash pull this kind of attitude). What
I’ve discovered, however, is that brilliance can be found anywhere, though some
people simply refuse to see it. Sure, these comedians don’t always hit the mark, but who hits it all the time? What is true of “Weird Al” is true also of
the guys over at Mad Magazine. They are usually funny (and there’s nothing
wrong with that), and are quite often brilliant, without garnering the
accolades their talent would suggest. So
I’m reviewing a comic book in my journal (and now this blog, a whole decade later), and I complained in my journal before about how I sometimes applaud things this world finds juvenile and trivial. I should rethink that embarrassment. I mean, funny is funny, and as long as it’s
not just sick (like a lot of modern entertainment), then I see nothing wrong
with liking some good comedy along the path of life. At the very least, I shouldn't be so discomfited by it.